Tuesday, August 24, 2021


 

 

The Broken U.S. Healthcare Delivery System

Most of us live relatively “normal” lives.  We get up in the morning and do what we normally do and have little time to think about the healthcare delivery system.  We see our doctor for our annual physical and occasionally must seek out care for health concerns that emerge.

We may have a general notion that healthcare costs are high, but few of us really think about how high it is and how the quality of our care compares to other industrialized nations.  Brace yourselves.   What I am about to share with you is shocking beyond belief.   I have spent my entire adult life dedicated to the healthcare industry and am embarrassed at these findings.

In 1970 the U.S. devoted 6 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on healthcare and comparable industrialized nations devoted 5 percent of their GDP on healthcare.   I do not know that this is even statistically significant.  In the current year (2021) the U.S. is devoting 18 percent of its GDP on healthcare while comparable nations at are at ten percent.  This is a huge difference.

The first thing that occurred to me was, well we may pay more for healthcare, but it is obviously far superior to other comparable nations. 

 

Not so.  With clear exceptions, the outcomes of U.S. healthcare is a national disgrace.  Read and weep.

In a study commissioned by the Commonwealth Fund, 100 leading industrialized countries healthcare system were evaluated and ranked.  France was ranked number one.   United States was ranked 37th just ahead of Slovenia.  Having access to healthcare is seen as a fundamental human right by many people. Lack of quality healthcare can result in a poor quality of life and lower life expectancy than countries with a stable and accessible healthcare system. Countries with efficient and effective health care systems have overall better health outcomes.

 

How is the quality of healthcare determined? Several factors determine the level of healthcare quality in each country. These include the care process (preventative care measures, safe care, coordinated care, and engagement and patient preferences), access (affordability and timeliness), administrative efficiency, equity, and healthcare outcomes (population health, mortality amenable to healthcare, and disease-specific health outcomes). A study by The Commonwealth Fund used these metrics to rank 11 countries based on their quality of healthcare. The top-ranked countries are the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands.

 

Healthcare outcomes are changes in health that result from specific measures or investments. Healthcare outcomes include amenable mortality, readmission, and patient experience. The Healthcare Access & Quality (HAQ) Index ranks healthcare outcome scores on a scale of 0 to

 

100, with 100 being the best. Countries with the best healthcare systems in the world have scores between 90-96.1. The Netherlands holds the highest score of 96.1.

What countries have the best healthcare in the world?

Switzerland's health care is universal, and health insurance is required for all persons living in Switzerland. Unlike other European countries, Swiss healthcare is not tax-based or financed by employers. Individuals pay for it through their contribution to Swiss healthcare schemes. There are no free state-provided health services. Still, basic health insurance coverage covers 80-90% healthcare costs, including outpatient treatment, emergency treatment, prescriptions, maternal medicine, vaccinations, post-operation rehabilitation, and more. Switzerland combines private, subsidized private and public healthcare systems to provide its citizens with an extensive network of qualified doctors, best-equipped medical facilities and hospitals, and no waiting lists.

Finland's healthcare system is believed to be one of the best in the world. Healthcare in Finland is a highly decentralized, three-level, publicly funded system. Municipalities are responsible for offering their residents healthcare services. Funding comes from two sources: municipal financing based on taxes used to provide primary healthcare services and National Health Insurance (NHI), which is financed with compulsory fees. NHI funds private healthcare, occupational healthcare, and outpatient care. In a European Commission survey, 88% of Finnish respondents stated that they were satisfied with their healthcare.

 

Disease burden is higher in the U.S. than in comparable countries:

 

Age-standardized disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rate per 100,000 population, 2017:

 

·         United States                        24,307

·        Comparable Country           18,533

 

After a steady decline in premature death rates, the U.S. has experienced a recent uptick:

Overall age-specific potential years of life lost per 100,000 population, 1990-2017:

·         United States                        14,000

·        Comparable Country             8,900

is possible to drag this out by looking at surgical errors, nosocomial infections, life expectancy, maternal health, and others.   It simply gets more depressing.

There are clear exceptions in U.S. quality.  I will name just one.   Kaiser-Permanente regularly ranks as one of if not the best providers of the full range of medical and hospital services.

There are also organizations that are prepared to help physicians and hospital to provide “perfect care” not just good care.  I will single out the best, Value Capture, LLC based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

So, there is hope for a brighter future, but the current circumstance is hard to look at without acquiring indigestion.

 

 

Jan Ricks Jennings, MHA, LFACHE

Senior Executive

Senior Management Resources, LLC

 

Jan.Jennings@EagleTalons.net

JanJenningsBlog.Blogspot.com

 

412.913.0636 Cell

724.733.0509 Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment