Sunday, November 21, 2021

                                                                       Hand Surgery






Introduction

Surgical treatment includes open or endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgical procedure is the most common hand and wrist surgery in the USA, with over 400,000 procedures per year and relatively high social and economic costs that exceed USD 2 billion, annually.

The development of hand surgery and the education of hand surgeons in America in the twentieth century are commonly attributed to Sterling Bunnell, a general surgeon who developed a keen interest in surgery of the hand. His seminal article describing tendon repair in 1918 initiated focused interest in this field. Bunnell’s involvement in hand surgery greatly increased as a result of the Second World War, when US Army Surgeon General Norman Kirk recognized the need for specialized surgeons and coordinated care to treat the various extremity injuries seen in combat. As a result, a formal system of treating hand injuries was begun. Hand surgery became a more specific specialty in the 1940s with the development of regional hand centers, the formation of hand societies, and publication of the monograph: Surgery of the Hand.

 

Since that time clinical interest in surgery of the hand has increased dramatically. The body of literature germane to hand surgery blossomed between 1950 and 1990, when hand surgery moved from the exclusive treatment of extremity trauma to include more diverse care such as reconstruction for arthritis and microsurgical tissue transfer. The formation of hand societies, including the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) in 1946 and the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS) in 1970 has led to the development of more formal practice guidelines, a rigorous training system, and focused research with dedicated scientific journals as well as added certification in hand surgery by the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery, American Board of Surgery, and American Board of Plastic Surgery. The literature has broadened in scope to include all facets of adult and pediatric hand surgery.

 

 


 

Few authors have endeavored to describe the “classic” papers in the hand surgery literature. In one article, 26 papers and chapters were identified within 13 clinical categories and selected based on the author’s opinion and experience. Another grouping of seminal articles within the field is Stern’s “Selected Readings in Hand Surgery,” where approximately 500 articles were identified based on their educational value for residents and fellows.

Despite the large volume of publications and the aforementioned grouping of classic papers, there have been no studies identifying in an objective, scientific manner the manuscripts with the most impact from the dedicated hand, orthopedic, and plastic surgery journals. The goal of this study was to identify the 50 most cited articles in hand surgery and to identify and categorize the subject matter described within

A literature search was performed to identify highly cited articles from the following six scientific, peer-reviewed journals from their inception to the present:  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) American Volume,  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) British Volume,  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS), Journal of Hand Surgery (JHS) American Volume,  Journal of Hand Surgery (JHS) British and European Volume, and  Hand.

A literature search was performed on January 1, 2010, via Thomson/Reuters Web of Knowledge to identify the most cited articles in each of the aforementioned journals, and the top articles were then cross-checked for accuracy of content with the Medline database. Along with basic information about an article (such as author, title, date of publication), the Thomson/Reuters search engine provides information about the number of times that a particular article has been cited by other articles.

 

To obtain this citation information, we entered the Thomson/Reuters Web of Knowledge search engine online. This allows for search by “publication name,” and we independently and serially input each of the six journals used for this manuscript. All published articles for a given journal were then identified; the list was then sorted by “times cited.” For the purpose of this study, we sorted articles from each journal by times cited, from highest to lowest.

The top 1,000 highly cited articles for each of the six journals were identified in the above manner and collected into a spreadsheet. For the journals that have a more broad focus than just hand surgery (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, JBJS American, JBJS British), the senior author reviewed each article, starting with the most highly cited, and then separated the top 50 that explicitly reported about hand surgery. For the hand surgery specific journals (JHS American, JHS British and European, Hand), the top 50 cited articles were chosen.

 

The top 50 highly cited articles for each of the six journals were then combined into one spreadsheet (total of 50×6=300 articles) and sorted by times cited. The top 50 of the combined articles were selected to be the subject of this study. Each of these articles was then cross-checked against the Medline database to check accuracy of content and applicability to hand surgery. If there were any discrepancies, the original article was checked and kept in the study if accurate or discarded from the study if inaccurate.

The top 50 highly cited articles were then sorted by number of citations, both in absolute number and also stratified by citations per year. This was done to eliminate the bias associated with publication year as older articles have had more time for citation. These 50 articles were further classified by surgical/anatomic topic (distal radius fracture, carpal tunnel syndrome, flexor tendon repair, wrist kinematics, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), scaphoid fracture and management, wrist instability, and nerve repair/grafting), type of study (clinical or experimental—defined as human vs. non-human subjects), and study sub-type: anatomical/functional, discovery/classification, innovation, validation, or outcomes. Anatomical/functional refers to a study that investigated the structural or mechanical components of the hand (an example of this would be a study of the ligaments surrounding the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb). Discovery refers to a study that led to the identification of a physiologic or clinical principle (an example would be the discovery that pressures in the carpal tunnel are elevated in carpal tunnel syndrome). Innovation refers to studies in which a novel technique or idea is presented; i.e., a new drug or surgical technique. Validation refers to a study that validated a questionnaire or survey (i.e., validation of the DASH survey). All clinical studies were further sub-categorized by level of evidence and whether they were therapeutic, prognostic, diagnostic, or economic in nature.

 


 

The distribution, by topic, of the 50 most highly cited hand surgery articles was compared to the distribution of all indexed publications (Medline search) of these same topics.

 

To obtain a thematic distribution for the 50 most highly cited articles, the number of articles identified per category was divided by 50 and a percentage obtained, i.e., (scaphoid articles/50) %. To obtain a comparative thematic distribution from all hand-surgery-related topics, a search was done for the term “hand surgery” and the total number of articles identified, followed by a search for each of the aforementioned categories (i.e., “scaphoid fracture” or “distal radius fracture”). Next, the number of articles in each of these specific categories was divided by the total number of indexed “hand surgery” articles to result in a percentage of the total articles per category (i.e., scaphoid articles/total hand surgery articles %). The 50 most highly cited articles and all articles related to hand surgery were compared; analysis was performed using a Pearson correlation.

 

Lastly, the educational relevance of these papers was assessed by comparing these articles to published lists of “classic” papers in hand surgery and to Stern’s Selected Readings in Hand Surgery used for educational purposes.

 

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a Pearson correlation between groups, with an absolute value closer to 1 indicating greater correlation.

Results

Fifty articles were identified as the most highly cited within the hand surgery literature (see Table 1). The number of total citations per article ranged from 133 to 553 (mean 210), and the number of citations per year ranged from 5.79 to 30.6 (mean 8.50). Thirty-six of these articles were found to be consistently highly cited since publication, defined as more than seven citations per year. These highly cited articles were published in five of the six searched journals.

 

Jan Ricks Jennings, MHA, LFACHE

Senior Consultant

Senior Management Services

412.913.0636 Cell

724.733.0509 Office

 

Jan.Jennings@EagleTalons.net

JanJenningsBlog.Blogspot.com

 

November 21, 2021 

No comments:

Post a Comment